<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: WYSIWYG-Editors: They just don&#8217;t get it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evolution515.net/article/wysiwyg-editors-they-just-dont-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evolution515.net/article/wysiwyg-editors-they-just-dont-get-it/</link>
	<description>Chaos ist nur eine andere Bezeichung für steigende Komplexität.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:02:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Blu:RayNe</title>
		<link>http://blog.evolution515.net/article/wysiwyg-editors-they-just-dont-get-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4556</link>
		<dc:creator>Blu:RayNe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evolution515.net/article/wysiwyg-editors-they-just-dont-get-it/#comment-4556</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t blame the Ext.js-Team indeed i respect Jack Slocum and the guys beyond it very much. I just don&#039;t understand why every major framework or WYSIWYG editor does it the ?wrong? way. Is it the customer to cope with? Why let customers decide on bad markup?

Anyway, meanwhile the WYSIWYG editor was extended and they sell it for cash: http://www.wysiwygpro.com/

Meanwhile I prefer using FCKeditor and a nice cleanup script like HTMLPurfier ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t blame the Ext.js-Team indeed i respect Jack Slocum and the guys beyond it very much. I just don&#8217;t understand why every major framework or WYSIWYG editor does it the ?wrong? way. Is it the customer to cope with? Why let customers decide on bad markup?</p>
<p>Anyway, meanwhile the WYSIWYG editor was extended and they sell it for cash: <a href="http://www.wysiwygpro.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wysiwygpro.com/</a></p>
<p>Meanwhile I prefer using FCKeditor and a nice cleanup script like HTMLPurfier <img src='http://blog.evolution515.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: ktp</title>
		<link>http://blog.evolution515.net/article/wysiwyg-editors-they-just-dont-get-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4444</link>
		<dc:creator>ktp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evolution515.net/article/wysiwyg-editors-they-just-dont-get-it/#comment-4444</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on lack of predefined styles, but you should keep in mind that the Ext team has done real good work with their framework and you can throw in any editor of your choice. There&#039;s even the possibility to build your own Ext with just the functionality you need so the footprint will be much smaller than with other frameworks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on lack of predefined styles, but you should keep in mind that the Ext team has done real good work with their framework and you can throw in any editor of your choice. There&#8217;s even the possibility to build your own Ext with just the functionality you need so the footprint will be much smaller than with other frameworks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Richard Tallent</title>
		<link>http://blog.evolution515.net/article/wysiwyg-editors-they-just-dont-get-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3462</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tallent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evolution515.net/article/wysiwyg-editors-they-just-dont-get-it/#comment-3462</guid>
		<description>I agree that the Ext team really should be more markup-focused in its editor. Typeface/Size = old and busted, semantic markup = new hotness.

But why berate the poor guys on their blog on the day of a significant release? Ext is extensible, so I can only assume it would be reasonably easy to create a new editor that removes the typeface and size buttons and replaces them with a drop-down of Header 1, Header 2, Normal, etc.

Actually, the only other things keeping me from using this in my own work are (1) I don&#039;t want to replace my entire form-generation framework, and (2) the lack of XHTML scrubbing like TinyMCE has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Ext team really should be more markup-focused in its editor. Typeface/Size = old and busted, semantic markup = new hotness.</p>
<p>But why berate the poor guys on their blog on the day of a significant release? Ext is extensible, so I can only assume it would be reasonably easy to create a new editor that removes the typeface and size buttons and replaces them with a drop-down of Header 1, Header 2, Normal, etc.</p>
<p>Actually, the only other things keeping me from using this in my own work are (1) I don&#8217;t want to replace my entire form-generation framework, and (2) the lack of XHTML scrubbing like TinyMCE has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
